Artemis City Launch Week Social Media Kit
Published on June 10, 2024
Distribution Channels: Twitter/X, LinkedIn, HackerNews, Reddit
Goal: Drive awareness, GitHub stars, Discord joins
Posting Schedule: Daily during launch week
Brand Voice Guidelines
Tone:
- Technical but accessible
- Confident without arrogance
- Systems-thinking mindset
- Infrastructure engineer, not marketer
Avoid:
- Hype words ("revolutionary", "groundbreaking")
- Vague claims ("10x better")
- Overselling
- Marketing jargon
Embrace:
- Specific technical details
- Honest comparisons
- Clear differentiation
- Real problems solved
Pre-Launch (Weekend Before)
Twitter/X Thread
Tweet 1:
I spent 10 years at Morgan Stanley building derivatives systems in C++.
One rule I learned: never let the model make infrastructure decisions.
Every AI agent framework breaks this rule.
So I built something different. π§΅
Tweet 2:
Auto-GPT, LangChain, BabyAGIβthey all put the LLM in charge.
The LLM decides:
β’ Which agent to run
β’ Which tools to use
β’ When to stop
Result: non-deterministic chaos.
Same input β different outputs. Every. Single. Time.
Tweet 3:
What if we inverted the architecture?
Instead of:
LLM β decides everything
What about:
Kernel β routes deterministically
LLM β provides intelligence
Like Unix: processes don't decide their own priority. The kernel does.
Tweet 4:
That's Artemis City.
A kernel-driven OS for AI agents.
β’ YAML-defined routing (not LLM guessing)
β’ User-owned memory (Obsidian + Supabase)
β’ RBAC + audit trails
β’ Trust-decay memory model
β’ Production-ready reliability
Launching Monday. π
Tweet 5:
Why "Artemis"?
I asked ChatGPT what to name an agentic OS.
It chose "Artemis"βGreek goddess of the hunt, protector, guide.
The AI named itself.
That moment crystallized the philosophy: AI and humans collaborate, but humans govern.
Tweet 6:
Production-ready kernel + router launching Monday.
If you're tired of herding unpredictable LLMs, join us:
β GitHub: [link]
π¬ Discord: [link]
π Docs: [link]
"From LLM Chaos β Agent Orchestration"
LinkedIn Post (Professional Angle)
ποΈ Launching Artemis City: A Kernel for AI Agents
After 10 years building high-performance derivatives systems at Morgan Stanley, I learned one rule:
Never let probabilistic models make deterministic infrastructure decisions.
Yet every AI agent framework does exactly thatβputting the LLM in charge of routing, tools, and orchestration.
The result? Non-deterministic behavior, runaway loops, and zero production reliability.
So I built Artemis Cityβa kernel-driven operating system for multi-agent orchestration:
β
Deterministic routing via YAML (not LLM guessing)
β
User-owned memory (Obsidian + Supabase, no vendor lock-in)
β
Governance primitives (RBAC, audit trails, trust-decay)
β
Multi-agent orchestration with persistent state
Think of it as Unix for AI agents: processes provide compute, the kernel provides governance.
We're launching the production-ready kernel + router on Monday.
If you're building production AI systems and tired of unpredictable frameworks, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
GitHub: [link]
Whitepaper: [link]
#AI #MLOps #SoftwareEngineering #Infrastructure
Launch Day (Monday)
Twitter/X Announcement
ποΈ Artemis City v1.0 is live.
The kernel-driven operating system for AI agents.
Not another LLM wrapper. A governance layer that makes agents production-ready.
β GitHub: [link]
π 5-min quick-start: [link]
π¬ Discord: [link]
From LLM Chaos β Agent Orchestration.
Twitter/X Follow-up (2 hours later)
Why kernel-driven matters:
Auto-GPT: "Let the LLM decide everything"
β $50 burned in runaway loops
β Non-deterministic behavior
β No governance
Artemis City: "Kernel decides routing, LLM provides intelligence"
β Deterministic workflows
β RBAC + audit trails
β Production-ready
Try it: [quick-start link]
HackerNews Show HN (See dedicated page)
Reddit r/MachineLearning
Title: [P] Artemis City v1.0 β Kernel-Driven Operating System for AI Agents
Post:
Hey r/MachineLearning,
I've been working on a different approach to multi-agent orchestration, and I'm launching v1.0 today.
**The Problem:**
Current frameworks (Auto-GPT, LangChain, BabyAGI) put the LLM in charge of routing, tools, and orchestration. This leads to:
- Non-deterministic behavior (same input β different outputs)
- Runaway loops burning API credits
- No governance or audit trails
- Not production-ready
**The Approach:**
Invert the architecture. Put a kernel at the center (like Unix):
- Kernel decides routing via YAML config (deterministic)
- LLMs provide intelligence (but don't orchestrate)
- RBAC + audit trails for governance
- User-owned memory (Obsidian + Supabase)
- Trust-decay model for memory reliability
**What's Included:**
- Kernel + router + CLI (`codex` command)
- Agent templates (coder, planner, researcher)
- Plugin system (OpenAI, Anthropic, filesystem, shell, Supabase)
- 5-minute quick-start guide
**GitHub:** [link]
**Whitepaper:** [link] (includes architecture details, trust-decay formula, comparison table)
**Quick-start:** [link]
Happy to answer questions about the architecture, implementation, or design decisions.
Open to feedbackβthis is v1.0, not perfect, but production-ready.
Day 2 (Tuesday) - Origin Story
Twitter/X
How Artemis City got its name:
Me: "What should I call an agentic operating system?"
ChatGPT: "Artemis."
Not "AgentOS" or "IntelliKernel" or some SEO-optimized nothing.
ArtemisβGreek goddess of the hunt, protector, guide.
The AI chose its own name.
Full story: [blog link]
The moment that crystallized Artemis City's philosophy:
I asked ChatGPT what to name an agentic operating system.
It responded: "Artemis."
This wasn't just a name suggestion. It was a signal.
Artemis didn't *decide* to be ArtemisβI accepted the suggestion because it resonated.
That's exactly how agent orchestration should work:
β’ AI brings intelligence and creativity
β’ Kernel brings governance and determinism
β’ Human controls the architecture
Read the full origin story: [link]
And if you're building production AI systems, check out what we're building: [link]
Day 3 (Wednesday) - Technical Deep-Dive
Twitter/X Thread
Tweet 1:
Why LLM wrappers fail (a thread on architecture):
Most agent frameworks look like this:
User β LLM β Tool β LLM β Action β LLM β...
The LLM decides everything.
This is the fundamental mistake. π§΅
Tweet 2:
Problem 1: Non-deterministic routing
"Build a REST API"
Run 1: Plans, then codes β
Run 2: Codes immediately, no planning β
Run 3: Researches for 20 min, never codes β
Same input. Three workflows. Zero predictability.
Tweet 3:
Problem 2: No governance
LLM: "I'll clean up your codebase!"
β Calls filesystem_delete("/")
β Your production DB: gone
β Your code: gone
β Your career: questioning everything
No permissions. No audit. No safety.
Tweet 4:
The fix: Kernel-driven architecture
ββββββββββββ
β KERNEL β β Routing, permissions, state
ββββββ¬ββββββ
β
Agents β LLMs
Kernel controls. LLMs compute.
Like Unix: processes don't decide their priority.
Tweet 5:
Artemis City implements this:
β’ YAML routing (deterministic)
β’ RBAC (explicit tool permissions)
β’ Audit logs (why did agent X do Y?)
β’ Trust-decay (memory reliability over time)
Production-ready by design.
Full technical deep-dive: [blog link]
Day 4 (Thursday) - Community Highlights
Twitter/X
Artemis City day 3:
β 127 GitHub stars
π₯ 43 Discord members
π¬ First plugin contribution merged
π 3 production deployments
Favorite feedback:
"Finally, a framework that doesn't fight me."
"Deterministic routing is a game-changer."
"This is what I've been looking for."
Thank you. π
Three days into the Artemis City launch, and the response has been incredible:
β’ 127 GitHub stars
β’ 43 Discord community members
β’ First community plugin contribution merged
β’ Several production deployments already
What I'm learning:
Developers are *tired* of unpredictable agent frameworks.
They want:
β
Determinism (same input β same output)
β
Governance (audit trails, permissions)
β
Ownership (their memory, their control)
β
Reliability (production-ready, not demos)
This validates the kernel-driven approach.
If you're building multi-agent systems, I'd love to hear what challenges you're facing.
Join the discussion: [Discord link]
Day 5 (Friday) - Week 1 Retrospective
Twitter/X Thread
Tweet 1:
Artemis City: Week 1 retrospective
5 days ago, we launched a kernel-driven OS for AI agents.
Here's what we learned. π§΅
Tweet 2:
What worked:
β
Clear differentiation (kernel vs LLM-driven)
β
Honest comparisons (vs Auto-GPT, LangChain)
β
5-min quick-start (30% conversion)
β
Technical whitepaper (credibility)
β
Origin story (brand authenticity)
150+ stars, 50+ Discord members in week 1.
Tweet 3:
What we learned:
1. Developers want determinism more than autonomy
2. "User-owned memory" resonates strongly
3. The Unix kernel analogy clicks immediately
4. Trust-decay model sparks great discussions
5. Enterprise teams asking about governance early
Tweet 4:
Top friction points:
β Setup complexity (we're simplifying)
β Plugin docs need more examples
β Obsidian integration unclear to some
We're addressing all of these in v1.1.
Open feedback: what would help you adopt Artemis City?
Tweet 5:
Next 30 days:
π― Plugin marketplace
πΉ Video tutorial series
π‘οΈ Enhanced governance (audit dashboard)
π’ Enterprise features (SSO, compliance)
π Performance optimizations
We're just getting started.
Thank you for an incredible week. π
Ongoing Content (Post-Launch)
Weekly Tips
Example 1:
π‘ Artemis City tip:
Test your routing logic before deploying:
codex router test "your query here"
Shows which agent would handle the request.
No LLM calls. No cost. Just validation.
Determinism = testability.
Example 2:
π‘ Artemis City tip:
User-owned memory means you can:
π Read agent output in Obsidian
π Query structured data via SQL
π Build custom dashboards
π Link memory to your PKM system
Your agents, your data, your control.
Community Showcases
π Community Showcase:
@username built a research assistant with Artemis City that:
1. Searches academic papers (researcher agent)
2. Synthesizes findings (planner agent)
3. Generates summary reports (coder agent)
All deterministic. All governed. All in their Obsidian vault.
Amazing work! π
[Link to showcase]
Response Templates
When someone asks "vs Auto-GPT?"
Great question!
Auto-GPT: Exploration & demos (LLM decides everything)
Artemis City: Production systems (kernel decides routing)
Both validβdifferent purposes.
Detailed comparison: [link]
When someone asks "How to get started?"
pip install artemis-city
codex init my-first-agent
codex run coder "Hello world"
Under 5 minutes. Full guide: [link]
When someone reports an issue
Thank you for the feedback!
Could you share:
1. Error message / unexpected behavior
2. Your routing config (agent_router.yaml)
3. Artemis City version (codex --version)
This helps us fix it quickly.
GitHub issue: [link] or Discord: [link]
Hashtag Strategy
Primary:
#AI #MachineLearning #MLOps #SoftwareEngineering
Secondary:
#LLM #AgenticAI #Infrastructure #DevTools
Avoid:
#AGI #AIRevolution (too hype-y)
Metrics to Track
Social:
- Impressions
- Engagement rate
- Click-through to GitHub
Conversion:
- GitHub stars
- Discord joins
- Quick-start completions
Sentiment:
- Positive mentions
- Feature requests
- Pain points mentioned
Media Assets
Logo Variations:
- Full logo + wordmark
- Icon only
- Monochrome versions
Architecture Diagrams:
- Kernel-driven vs LLM-driven
- Memory bus architecture
- Multi-agent orchestration flow
Screenshots:
- CLI output examples
- Routing config
- Memory bus in Obsidian
Short Clips:
- 5-second install demo
- 15-second first agent run
- 30-second multi-agent workflow
Remember: Authenticity > polish. Technical depth > hype. Problems solved > features listed.